🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, growing to encompass events where African descendants are remunerated to speak with white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what increasing understanding is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the middle of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in autumn in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it develops is a valuable example in how appropriation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the United States, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the observance illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, assuming they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to air their fears and experiences. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of “microaggressions”, but challenged by the threats that face all if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.